On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:46 PM Dom Heinzeller ***@***.***> wrote: Thank you all for reviewing the change. I'll look for a suitable spot in the commit queue to get this merged. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#566 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKFOCLD7MYKPAZWKI4FA4NDS6LH7RANCNFSM4XNCWZNA> .

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:41 PM dustinswales ***@***.***> wrote: @ligiabernardet <https://github.com/ligiabernardet> @climbfuji <https://github.com/climbfuji> Just FYI I can confirm that this bug doe not impact the RRTMGP-2-Thompson MP coupling. See lines 183-185, https://github.com/NCAR/ccpp-physics/blob/master/physics/GFS_rrtmgp_thompsonmp_pre.F90 — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#566 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE7WQAWKX7PAPNYOH7AWSETS6QXFXANCNFSM4XNCWZNA> .

On 2/10/2021 12:41 PM, tanyasmirnova wrote: ***@***.**** approved this pull request. @climbfuji <https://github.com/climbfuji> @RuiyuSun <https://github.com/RuiyuSun> Thank you, Ruiyu, for noticing this bug that we overlooked. This fix does effect the cloud-radiation interaction with the use of Thompson MP, especially in the areas of subgrid clouds from MYNN PBL. Below are the diff plots of surface LW and SW radiation after 120-h fcst initialized at 5 Sept 2020 0 UTC (fix minus bug). The differences are the largest in the polar regions. Screen Shot 2021-02-10 at 10 36 23 AM <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/38667904/107548807-545e6d00-6b8c-11eb-9db8-d718afb62177.png> Screen Shot 2021-02-10 at 10 35 16 AM <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/38667904/107548863-63ddb600-6b8c-11eb-94d3-c80faddb9fd5.png> — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#566 (review)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALQ75MJYE37DF4NR5ITSBRTS6LAMDANCNFSM4XNCWZNA>.

On 2/12/2021 8:41 AM, Hannah C Barnes wrote: I am not an expert in polar clouds, but I remember I had a similar question a few years. Surprising there is quite a bit of literature about mixed-phase clouds in the arctic. (Here is one example https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1332 <https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1332>). I am not sure where the largest impact from this code change should be, but having at least some impact in polar regions seems reasonable to me. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#566 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALQ75MNQUJMNPCLVRKR4NQDS6UVYZANCNFSM4XNCWZNA>.

Thanks for the info and the reference! On 2/12/2021 8:41 AM, Hannah C Barnes wrote: > > I am not an expert in polar clouds, but I remember I had a similar > question a few years. Surprising there is quite a bit of literature > about mixed-phase clouds in the arctic. (Here is one example > https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1332 > <https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1332>). I am not sure where the > largest impact from this code change should be, but having at least > some impact in polar regions seems reasonable to me. > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#566 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALQ75MNQUJMNPCLVRKR4NQDS6UVYZANCNFSM4XNCWZNA >. > — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#566 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKY5N2KXHHTGKGXPAOJ6WMDS6UV7ZANCNFSM4XNCWZNA> .

Two more references on mixed phase clouds in the Arctic (GFS SCM was included in the intercomparison) https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.416 https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/qj.415 On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 8:43 AM ericaligo-NOAA ***@***.***> wrote: > Thanks for the info and the reference! > > On 2/12/2021 8:41 AM, Hannah C Barnes wrote: > > > > I am not an expert in polar clouds, but I remember I had a similar > > question a few years. Surprising there is quite a bit of literature > > about mixed-phase clouds in the arctic. (Here is one example > > https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1332 > > <https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo1332>). I am not sure where the > > largest impact from this code change should be, but having at least > > some impact in polar regions seems reasonable to me. > > > > — > > You are receiving this because you commented. > > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > > <#566 (comment) >, > > or unsubscribe > > < > https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALQ75MNQUJMNPCLVRKR4NQDS6UVYZANCNFSM4XNCWZNA > >. > > > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#566 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKY5N2KXHHTGKGXPAOJ6WMDS6UV7ZANCNFSM4XNCWZNA > > . > -- *Fanglin Yang, Ph.D.* *Chief, Model Physics Group* *Modeling and Data Assimilation Branch* *NOAA/NWS/NCEP Environmental Modeling Center* *https://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/wx24fy/fyang/ <https://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/wx24fy/fyang/>* — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#566 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKFOCLGX6RXJFVUFM7WRLHTS6U6K5ANCNFSM4XNCWZNA> .